Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Clinton "Hawkish" on War Holds the Center

Shocking news flash: We are winning in Iraq and conducting "mop up" operations.

Next election, as "hawkish" as Clinton is sounding, don't forget that she was moving with the wind of the polls and declaring the war lost while simultaneously insisting that there was no way to pull the troops out "after the disaster" that the President allegedly was presiding over. She was not prescient. She was an opportunist. That's no way to run a war and it is no way to run a presidency.

And don't let the rest of those slippery, weasel "the war is lost" people escape either. John Biden and the rest of the "hawkish doves" (Democrat or Republican) should take a flying leap.

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Me and Sen. Reid Part II: Eat That!

Another late night after supporting the troops. I decided that I would give Sen. Reid the benefit of the doubt and check to see if he showed up anywhere supporting the troops. I googled his name and couldn't find him anywhere, particularly, at any event supporting our troops. I would bet that my original assumption about Sen. Reid knocking off early Friday from the Senate to recover from his busted all-nighter was incorrect. He apparently knocked off on Thursday. Sen. Boxer probably convinced him that the elderly, infirm (apparently dementia suffering) senators were tired after all that hard work undermining the troops and needed a day of rest. You know, 'cause our troops are loosing sleep "over there" and can barely get a day to themselves, much less a three day weekend. So, they took a three day weekend in solidarity with our troops.

How thoughtful of them.

Apparently, the only "troop" rally he can be tempted to attend are with the "bring our Nazi, civilian killing troops home, we support the insurgents" Code Pink folks. Still, I looked for him or any Democrats as we attended back to back troop support activities and planned for an unexpected "welcome home" Saturday morning. Maybe you can spot Sen. Reid.

Nope. No Sen. Reid here.





Still couldn't find him.








If he was here, he was camouflaged as a tree or a trombone. Probably a tuba, considering he's such a blow hard.






Friday morning, I looked for him again, but still no Sen. Reid. We went to send off the Kansas National Guard on their next mission to a place in Europe where Democrats once sent our forces to stop a genocide and *gasp* perform "nation building", ushering a couple of countries into independence, freedom and democracy. Something that is apparently not allowed if the troops are sent by a Republican president in a land where people are 50% more likely to be Muslim and brown while simultaneously fighting our number one enemy: al Qaeda.

At the pre-mission staging, PGR and Soldiers' Angels gather to chat and discuss the mission. Sen. Reid was no where to be found. Neither was Dennis Moore (D) or any other Democrat politicians from the area.



Is this Sen. Reid? Maybe he was late? He was definitely not part of our flag line. I walked up and down looking for him, but didn't see him anywhere.





Nope. Not Sen. Reid. Just a soldier with his young son who exhibited a little more maturity than Sen. Reid by having the good sense to slumber in his own carrier before the ceremony. No beds wheeled into the Senate for this youngster. I'm also certain that the cake, ice cream and punch served after the event was much more palatable and exciting than the pizza Reid had ordered for the Senators sleep over.


While this Sgt. Maj. had an uncanny resemblance to Sen. Reid, I read his name tag and it was definitely not "Harry" or "Reid". Later, the Sgt Maj hung out with us in the parking lot, drinking water and thanking us for our support. That clinched it. No Harry Reid here.


Here we have a general and a colonel walking down our flag line, thanking us for our support. He shook everybody's hand. I mean, everybody. I know it wasn't Sen. Reid because Sen. Reid couldn't even give a few minutes to the Vets for Freedom, actual veterans from OIF and OEF that support the troops and the mission, much less recognizing the patriotism and support of regular, everyday citizens who don't wear pink.

We were unexpectedly invited to stand behind the podium with our flag line for the event. We went before the entire unit and their families, standing in the hot auditorium for the 45 minute ceremony, in conditions that, I'm sure, the good senator would have protested.


As the ceremony proceeded, I scanned the crowds for the good Senator Reid and any other Democrat Senator or Representative, wondering if they had come in the back way to avoid all the adulation they were sure to receive from this very motivated crowd. Senator Reid was no where to be found.



Not on the podium. Not in the crowd. Not in a tree. Not on a train. Not in a car. Not on a plane. Sen. Reid, "I support the troops by pronouncing the war lost", was probably still at home enjoying a late breakfast of eggs and ham.

Actually, I was kind of glad that Sen. Reid wasn't there. He would have been a real drag on the rest of the ceremony. Not to mention, I think his sour puss would have gotten even more sour when he didn't get the same applause we did as the commanding general thanked us for our support and standing behind our soldiers, "no matter what the mission".

Here's a T.I.N.S. moment: One and two star generals, Sgt Majors and several Colonels turned around on the podium and the entire auditorium of national guard and their families stood and gave us a standing ovation for our continued support. No photos, but I do have the video.



Eat that Sen. Reid!


Friday, July 20, 2007

Me and Sen. Reid

I don't know where Sen. Reid was tonight. I'm sure he was strategizing on how to kill...er...bring our troops home safely. However, I was at a small town "music in the park" where I handed out a hundred cards and fliers to people who wanted to support our troops. Particularly after I read a letter from one of our guys and told them about our 3000 (updated from 1200) marines. A nice school teacher wants to inquire about doing a project for her high school class.

I didn't see Sen. Reid anywhere.

Somebody has to do the hard work of supporting our troops. I got home and ate some spaghetti I threw in the pan with some butter, basil, garlic, parsley and oregano around midnight. I threw it on a paper plate, chowed down and am now getting ready to go to sleep so I can get up in the morning and go to a send off of a local unit.

Somehow, I imagine Sen. Reid was most likely eating a lovely meal fixed by his personal chef, served on his personal china, reading news clips printed by his staff, contemplating how he can undermine the battle for Iraq and our troops while chatting with his wife over the location of their new Chippendale sofa and when to return to the family manse for their quadrennial break from the horrific living conditions in DC.

Friday morning, I will ride in my beat up Pontiac with a broken door and no air conditioner, chow down on a breakfast biscuit from some fast food chain so I can stand on the flag line in the heat and humidity to send off our guys by 7:30 AM.

Sen. Reid will be riding in his air conditioned limousine after a lovely omelet served on his personal china, made with fresh hand picked ingredients, delivered to his DC mansion. He will arrive in his air conditioned office and spend the morning having his staff think up new ways to undermine the war, insult our troops, and mock our support of our troops. He will call it "supporting our troops".

I'll be looking around the flag line and noting the real patriots there. I'm pretty sure I won't see Sen. Reid or any of his staffers who thought it was cute to deliver "care packages" to his Republican opposition while 1200 [update: 3000] marines are waiting for letters and care packages from home.

As Sen. Reid takes his mid morning break in the steam and massage room to relieve the stress of all his hard work and "sleepless nights" in the basement of the Congressional House, I'll be watching the spouses, parents and children of the 35ID bravely hold back their tears and wave their loved ones good-bye. He'll go back to his air conditioned office and try to figure out how to raise more support for his next earmark laden bill. I'll hand out Soldiers' Angels cards and information on how to submit these soldiers for support. I'll talk to more supporters about joining our organization and adopting these men and many more because the need is so great.

When Sen. Reid finishes up his half day at the Senate before scurrying home for a long weekend, the real support for our troops will be heading back to work having taken a half-day's PTO out of their vacation time, while the families of these deploying soldiers will go home or to work and try not to cry in front of the kids, friends and family. I'll be here making phone calls to companies asking them for donations for our cause and then calling the VA to set up an appointment to deliver more supplies that are beyond their budget (thanks Harry, et al).

Saturday, while Harry plays eighteen holes of golf, I'll be up once again, driving 150 miles round trip to go meet the mother of a deployed soldier so we can plan our "Support the Troops: Freedom Walk 9/11/2007".

Now, I ask you, who supports the troops?

Ask the wife of a Marine: Dear Sen. Reid

Thursday, July 19, 2007

Democrats Deliver Care Packages to Senate But Can't Support Our Troops

I think I just about lost my mind when I read this report:

Metal Cots, Takeout Pizza and a Long Night of Recriminations

As midnight approached, the crowds began to grow, filling the visitor’s gallery above the Senate floor and forming a long line outside the chamber. Ordinary citizens watched, seemingly spellbound, as Republicans accused Democrats of staging a political show to dramatize opposition to the war. Even as Democrats brushed aside such suggestions, the party’s Congressional leaders and many lawmakers took a break from the debate to join a few hundred war protesters at a candlelight vigil outside the Capitol.[snip]

While Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, said Democrats were not staging the debate as a political stunt, members of his staff delivered care packages to their Republican counterparts. “A few supplies for your sleepless night — help us bring an end to this war,” read the note attached to a bundle of toiletries, tied with a yellow ribbon.
Not a political stunt? Hey, Harry! I have 1200 Marines who could have used those care packages you were using to make a mockery of our support for our troops! How about sending some of that our way?

Putz.

Suggestion to Republican Senators - please make good use of Sen. Reid's generous gift of care packages by sending them to the Marines, care of Soldiers' Angels at:

Fighting 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit
c/o Soldiers Angels
914 Tourmaline Drive
Newbury Park, CA 91320


Disclaimer: This is not an official Soldiers' Angels blog nor is this campaign sanctioned by Soldiers' Angels. The opinions expressed here are solely mine and do not reflect those of Soldiers' Angels or any of its officials. Soldiers' Angels is a non-partisan, non-profit organization whose only mission is to provide support to our deployed military men and women.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

The Current Iraq Debate: Do You Want To Win

Well, the Democrats are at it again. Not even waiting for September and already pronouncing our activities a failure. This is what the military calls a "shaping movement". There is nothing gained here but position for September. They are working to control the story line so that people will, hopefully, buy their story and pressure their Republican counterparts to jump on board for their next "let's withdraw" attack on the Battle in Iraq.

I recently read Gen. Conway's comments on Iraq where he rightly indicated that the entire Iraq combat situation had been misnamed. It should have been called the Battle in Iraq and the Battle in Afghanistan in the war on terror (or whatever you want to call it). The truth is, there is no loss in Iraq. It can't be lost. Not just because I say so, but because it is a fact. Al Qaida and other groups cannot hold Iraq. Not while we are there. They can continue to be a pain. They can continue to kill people. But, they can't hold Iraq, control Iraq or otherwise feel safe there.

They are continually and ever more quickly being forced from one area to another in a spiraling effect that keeps them from being able to establish anything permanent or truly effective. At least, in a battlefield perspective.

Unfortunately, what they can do is keep the yellow tails' tongues wagging and the sky is falling chickens clucking up on capitol hill. These, in turn, keep the American Public trying to figure out what is going on. For what? It is very clear, considering the truth about Iraq, that it is to shape the final "battle" for control of the government in November 2008. No one should be confused on that subject. There is no higher moral ground nor security nor defense which prompts such actions.

Here's the truth about what the American Public thinks: they want our boys to come home. Hell, I want our men and women to come home. But, when you get down to brass tacks, the American public is split into three groups. The adamant "anti-war" crowd that didn't want to be at war anywhere. The "we shouldn't have been there and we should leave" and the "when is this going to be over so our men and women can come home" folks. That last group is the largest group. They are waiting to be told that the right strategy, the right battle, the end, is coming up and our troops can leave Iraq or draw down.

They want it to be over sooner rather than later, but they aren't demanding precipitous withdrawal. They are just as fatigued as our military over the continued battle front.

No, this is not a scientific poll. This is me, going to support the troops rallies, to open events and other programs where, as soon as someone mentions support the troops, someone, at some point of the night, is going to bring up "the war" and the administration and the troops.

I am not shocked by the attitudes. It is a long war. Fortunately, I am informed by history that there were plenty of people through out the civil war, WWI, WWII, etc who felt the same way. No one wants to see the wounded or dead. No one wants to be at war for ever. But, looking back on history, even as we took Normandy, traveled on to Paris and towards Nazi Germany, some were wondering how much longer this would take. Were these the last battles? Was the German Army really every going to be defeated? Even to the point where many were willing to negotiate with the Germans to end hostilities, leaving the Nazis in control of some areas and Germany in particular. Some folks really didn't give a damn whether the Nazis kept Germany or not if we could end the war.

Fortunately, smarter and harder heads prevailed, knowing that there was no peace as long as Nazi Germany and Hitler existed.

There in lies the lessons of our history. It is not really whether any of these ideologies look the same, sound the same or act the same. Though, Salafist Islamists do give every appearance of fascistic maniacs. It is not about whether one battle or the next looks like a current battle or strategy. Neither whether anyone of them led to final victory. It is about how we view the end results and their importance to our existence and future peace. It is about whether we have the patience. It is about what we will accept as an outcome.

Apparently, some believe we have weathered the great menace of Communism, came out on top, thus there is no one and nothing that could destroy us. Thus, there is no one, no place, no ideology that can oppose us. Thus, there is no reason to put in such a great effort.

I completely disagree. Such thoughts are the product of 20th century imagination which died on 9/11/2001.

It reminds of a little story of the man who was trying to out run a tiger, climbed a tree, only to find it occupied by a snake; fell out of the tree, climbed into a cave, was immediately bitten by a tiny, poisonous spider, ran home to his wife and promptly died in her arms.

The moral of the story is, it is not the most obvious nor biggest menace that you can see that can kill you. Those, at least, you can see and take actions against. Sometimes, it is the smallest things that are the deadliest.

In conclusion, yes, we want our men and women home, but, more importantly, we want the war to be over which is completely different than outright retreat. "The war to be over" means ending this ugly menace that comes in sizes sometimes too small to know it is about to attack you. The only way you can end that is by eradicating the species. The only way that occurs is if you go to the places it nests and stomp it out using the most effective means available: freedom backed with the fire power to ensure it.

I don't imagine that Iraq is the end of the actual "war" by any means. It is simply the next battle, the next hidey hole where they exist and it is not one that we can leave unattended or undisturbed.

The real question to the American Public is not whether they want "our boys" home. The real question is: Do You Want To Win?

I for one don't believe that we should cede one iota of sand when it is clear the enemy has not earned it, can't hold it and can't keep it.

In the meantime, Dick Durbin was quoted as saying that our men and women have been losing sleep over in Iraq while they are fighting this war and working hard, so congress should be willing to lose some sleep over this debate. News flash for Dick, I think our men and women know exactly how much sleep they have lost and may believe that Big Dick is partially responsible considering they have to keep getting up at night and watching their backs from the knife on the home front. Thanks for helping the enemy perform the pincer movement and various "Tokyor Rose" psyops on our own troops.

The real question here is how much sleep are you losing over our troops?

I don't know what Dick has been doing, but I know what I have been doing and why this blog has been silent even up to the lead up of this little political theater. I have a mission. That mission is to provide direct, meaningful, material and moral support to our troops. Every week, I plan, develop, cooperate with a coalition of other people and support groups to execute at least one operation to obtain or boost that support. Not because somebody like Dick told me to. He certainly doesn't give a damn and very unlikely has not donated any of his kickbacks or personal earnings to any organization to do so. If I'm wrong, goody gum drops for Dick. I'll put an extra dollar in the hat at the next rally I'm at.

In the meantime, thousands of troops are daily looking for support from the home front. They are in the dust, the dirt, the mud, the bugs, the blood and the sweat. They are in Africa, Afghanistan, the Philippines, Iraq and deployed on ships at sea around the world in defense of our nation. I don't have time for these political hobgoblin dances and neither do our troops.

They are looking to us, to you and the rest of the citizens of our nation to provide the moral and material support they need while they are deployed, when they are injured and as veterans in our VA medical system.

I'm at Soldiers' Angels and our troops need your support!

Final question to Dick: Where'd you sleep last night?




Didn't think so. Now STFU because I have work to do!

PS...I note that the AP was good enough to mention that Moveon.idiots were staging a vigil to coincide with the congressional sleep over, but apparently couldn't mention that the Vets for Freedom were on capitol hill urging the senators not to give in. Talk about the third front in the war. Right here. In the media. What a bunch of crap.

Friday, June 15, 2007

Reid: Pace failed on Iraq war assessment

Reid: Pace failed on Iraq war assessment

You know, the only way Reid and his ilk would be happy with the Generals and not accuse them of playing politics is if they stood on Capitol Hill, declared Iraq a loss and requested orders to retreat.

But, he knows these guys are easy marks because they are in the military and they are not supposed to make political comments that would place them in one party or the other. That includes defending themselves against such insinuations that some how still make them out to be political activists in uniform.

I think that's just about as low as you can get as a politician. That and letting your girlfriend drown in your car. Or getting your jollies in the oval office with your intern while you let your wife run the government. Or, taking bribes and freezing it in your kitchen. Or any number of other not so good things while you accuse the opposition of the same.

I guess, if you're Reid, you don't have much more to lose in terms of any integrity or standing. Guess he won't be running for president. Hate to see what his military advisors would look or sound like.

Thursday, May 03, 2007

We Win, They Lose: Sign the Petition




Pelosi and the rest of the Democrat Party are working hard to remind you that Iraq is a civil war and working harder to irradicate words like "War on Terror" and al Qaeda in Iraq.

You are supposed to forget how many times Al Qaeda (al Qaida) has issued statements from the Zawahiri, Zarqawi, and Bin Laden indicating the central theater of the war is in Iraq.

Maybe you remember the most recent statements, but you might not know or remember that Iraq was made a central part of the war on terror (and against Islamic extremists) back in 1998 by Bin Laden:

If some people have in the past argued about the fact of the occupation, all the people of the Peninsula have now acknowledged it. The best proof of this is the Americans' continuing aggression against the Iraqi people using the Peninsula as a staging post, even though all its rulers are against their territories being used to that end, but they are helpless.

Second, despite the great devastation inflicted on the Iraqi people by the crusader-Zionist alliance, and despite the huge number of those killed, which has exceeded 1 million... despite all this, the Americans are once against trying to repeat the horrific massacres, as though they are not content with the protracted blockade imposed after the ferocious war or the fragmentation and devastation.

So here they come to annihilate what is left of this people and to humiliate their Muslim neighbors.

Third, if the Americans' aims behind these wars are religious and economic, the aim is also to serve the Jews' petty state and divert attention from its occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there. The best proof of this is their eagerness to destroy Iraq, the strongest neighboring Arab state, and their endeavor to fragment all the states of the region such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Sudan into paper statelets and through their disunion and weakness to guarantee Israel's survival and the continuation of the brutal crusade occupation of the Peninsula.


Read the rest because the real "AQ in Iraq" has been going on for some time before the actual "shooting war" with Iraq began and we aren't talking about "nebulous ties" with the regime. We're talking about having extensive contacts within the country and its citizens.

Then there was the infamous bin Laden statement in 2003:

Regardless of the removal or the survival of the socialist party or Saddam, Muslims in general and the Iraqis in particular must brace themselves for jihad against this unjust campaign and acquire ammunition and weapons. [snip]

Muslims' doctrine and banner should be clear in fighting for the sake of God. He who fights to raise the word of God will fight for God's sake.

Under these circumstances, there will be no harm if the interests of Muslims converge with the interests of the socialists in the fight against the crusaders, despite our belief in the infidelity of socialists.

The jurisdiction of the socialists and those rulers has fallen a long time ago.

Socialists are infidels wherever they are, whether they are in Baghdad or Aden.

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Killing Me Softly: Sand Monkey Goes Dark

Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Though wise men at their end know dark is right,
Because their words had forked no lightning they
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright
Their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

And you, my father, there on the sad height,
Curse, bless me now with your fierce tears, I pray.
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
-Dylan Thomas


Someone I hadn't linked to in a long time, but have read routinely is the Egyptian blogger, Sand Monkey.

Sand Monkey was one of the first proponents of Democracy that I read in any other country besides the brothers at Iraq the Model. He was funny, snarky and serious all at once. He was pro-democracy, pro-American, and, though he would be categorized as "conservative" by current American politics, he is one of the most liberal Egyptians that I know.

His conversations with his NDP mother were priceless. Blogging about taxi rides, religious music and politics gave you a taste of Egypt on the ground. His site was the first place I ever talked to a real "Palestinian" about Israel, Palestine, Arafat and many other subjects. Most of all, his continued efforts to talk about the real political situation in Egypt, the motives, the laws and the people, allowed us to alternately hope for and fear for democracy in Egypt and the greater Middle East.

He's going dark now because Egypt has been arresting bloggers and, he fears, coming closer to him daily. He believes his anonymity has been compromised and, like the pamphlateers of old, he relied on that to be able to say whatever he felt about democracy and the lack of it in Egypt.

There have been stories of bloggers being beaten up and molested in jail. Egyptian authorities do not have the constraints on them that American police would have in treating people with some dignity or, at least, when THEY break the law they can be prosecuted, not rewarded.

Democracy is dying a slow death in some parts of the Middle East while a few bright lights continue such as Lebanon and, as strange as it might seem, Iraq.

Atlas Shrugs has an interview with Sand Monkey you don't want to miss.

Would you believe that he blames it on the Democrats winning the 2006 elections and taking over congress?

ATLAS: Why? What happened to the pressure in Washington?

SANDMONKEY: You know what happened to the pressure in Washington. The Democrats won the Congress. There is no more pressure coming from Bush because he is not able to push people anymore to do those things. He is not able to push the Egyptian government anymore because the American public is suddenly not interested in reforming the Middle East because of what's going on in the Iraq. So suddenly the Egyptian government is not afraid of the American pressure. They are doing whatever they want to do. They are beating up demonstrators, they are cracking down on activists, they are changing the constitution, and eroding civil liberties once and for all and they are using proxies to take down bloggers.


It's not just that the Egyptians are not afraid of the American pressure. They are betting on a Democrat government not putting any attachments on the 2 billion aid that they receive annually. Unlike the Bush administration which had insisted that they would put requirements on this aid if necessary. This had a lot of power behind it when it was a Republican congress.

The Democrat plan for the Middle East is what is motivating this reversion to type. Because they see democracy as a general failure in Iraq and they believe that the Middle East is a hotbed of Islamist terrorists and sympathizers, they have decided on putting their bets back on the "tyrants" to be able to hold down their populations and, in short, "crack down" on these folks with extreme prejudice. Of course, like any dictatorship, these laws are usually put in place with such alacrity that they are easily used to crush any dissent against the government. Sadly, as people like Sand Monkey show, they generally aren't advocating for violent overthrow of the government, are less dangerous and are more visible than an Islamist terrorist cell agitating against the government, planning attacks. The non-violent dissidents are usually the first to suffer and suffer more greatly than any terrorist group because they are the easiest to find.

The Democrats are willing to sell people's freedom for the ability of tyrants to fight a "proxy war" against terrorists. Considering 9/11 and other events, the dictators' abilities to do so is suspect, but they can certainly kill democracy without breaking a sweat.

They do it "legally", like dictators have for over a century, by passing laws for the "protection" of the people and the state while they grind them down.

Blogging anonymously provided an ability to organize and speak in ways that they had not been allowed to do in any other venue. It is the new pamphlateers that have written words that echoed around the world.

This ability to speak freely, among several other reasons, is why I started to blog. I wanted to say something and make my voice heard, not just mumble it to myself or a few friends.

Still, I understand Sand Monkey's fears. Thomas Paine and many others wrote anonymously for years. The pamphlateers' presses were sometimes found and shut down by the Brits, but many would simply move the press or start up someplace else.

Let us hope, someday, we hear his voice again.

In other news, the Iranians are cracking down on their dissidents. Stefania at free thoughts mentions that women are still defiant.

While Turkey citizens protest the Islamization of their government.

Please read Atlas Shrugs interview. She has a podcast of their discussion.

Say "goodnight" Sand Monkey.

Thomas Paine - The Crisis

THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated. Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny, has declared that she has a right (not only to TAX) but "to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER," and if being bound in that manner, is not slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth. Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God.


Common Sense

SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness POSITIVELY by uniting our affections, the latter NEGATIVELY by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.


Declaration of Independence

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.



Friday, April 20, 2007

Harry Reid, Spokesman for the Islamic State in Iraq: War is Lost

Wednesday, April 18, 2007, al Qaeda in Iraq, under the nom de guer Islamic State of Iraq, pulled off four suicide bombings in one day, killing 200 Iraqis, after being silent for almost five days after the suicide bombing in Parliament. Right on cue, al Qaeda's spokesman in the United States, gave a statement stating that the bombings were proof that the United States had lost the war and should withdraw:

Reid said he told President Bush on Wednesday he thought the war could not be won through military force, although he said the U.S. could still pursue political, economic and diplomatic means to bring peace to Iraq.

"I believe myself that the secretary of state, secretary of defense and — you have to make your own decisions as to what the president knows — (know) this war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq yesterday," said Reid, D-Nev.




Thursday, April 05, 2007

Hillary on a New GI Bill of Rights

Not supporting Hillary's campaign, but, since this is a military and political blog, I thought it would be interesting to view Hillary's "conversation" supporting a new GI Bill of Rights.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Love/Hate Relationship With War (Rated: Mature)

I found this over at Blonde Sagacity: I Miss Iraq. I Miss My Gun. I Miss My War.

I've been home from Iraq for more than a year, long enough for my time there to become a memory best forgotten for those who worried every day that I was gone. I could see their relief when I returned. Life could continue, with futures not so uncertain. But in quiet moments, their relief brought me guilt. Maybe they assume I was as overjoyed to be home as they were to have me home. Maybe they assume if I could do it over, I never would have gone. And maybe I wouldn't have. But I miss Iraq. I miss the war. I miss war. And I have a very hard time understanding why.

I'm glad to be home, to have put away my uniforms, to wake up next to my wife each morning. I worry about my friends who are in Iraq now, and I wish they weren't. Often I hated being there, when the frustrations and lack of control over my life were complete and mind-bending. I questioned my role in the occupation and whether good could come of it. I wondered if it was worth dying or killing for. The suffering and ugliness I saw disgusted me. But war twists and shifts the landmarks by which we navigate our lives, casting light on darkened areas that for many people remain forever unexplored. And once those darkened spaces are lit, they become part of us. At a party several years ago, long before the Army, I listened to a friend who had served several years in the Marines tell a woman that if she carried a pistol for a day, just tucked in her waistband and out of sight, she would feel different. She would see the world differently, for better or worse. Guns empower. She disagreed and he shrugged. No use arguing the point; he was just offering a little piece of truth. He was right, of course. And that's just the beginning.


Which got me thinking as I read it about my own thoughts on the war and how often I think about it. How much it consumes me even when I try to do "other things". I wrote a comment at Ala's:

You know, about "I miss war", it was really strange but I almost couldn't read it at the same time I HAD to read it.

Kind of like how he misses war. It's crazy like that. I actually feel like I am just on the edge of that "junkie" feeling because I have to spend hours looking at the war and trying to analyze where we are and what is going on. even to the point of sleep deprevation sometimes.

I think I need a psychiatrist.

On the other hand, I know I am looking for that "tipping point" that says "its all over but the shouting". I don't know if I'll actually recognize it, but I can't seem to stop looking for it, even when I tell myself that could be years away.

A part of this is 9/11. I know that people are right about the effects of the images. I haven't looked since the last anniversary, even then I was more looking at people's stories, not the images. because it keeps cutting the wound over and over. Still, I feel like that isn't over until everything else is over. I think that is how people feel when their loved one dies from violent crime and, even when they bury them, there is no "closure". Even when they catch the bad guy, there is no "closure", just that big empty hole that will need something else to fill it up once this alleged culturaly denoted "closure" occurs because you have spent so much time being angry and searching for that closure, you have nothing else.

I wasn't there. I just watched it on my TV and it is still a big empty hole, not just in the ground, but in my mind and in my soul.

And it is worse because I think I should be doing something. Me. I am supposed to do something about it and I am not, or not enough or can't do what I think I should be doing.

Somedays, I wish the war would just fade away to nothing and we would all go back to our "normal" lives. LIke that "9/10" world everyone talks about. In the 9/10 world, I thought I knew where I was, who I was and where I was going. The 9/11 world is much more confusing and angry. I am lost somedays and depressed because it doesn't appear to be clearing. Where I thought I wanted to "go" with my life no longer holds the same appeal. I think I should be doing something else, but I don't know what.

Other days, I am so angry, I wish I could fly to where ever bin Laden or Zawahiri or any of those other assholes were and shoot them dead. Probably stomp and kick their dead and dying bodies. then I would toss them from a helicopter into the center of the biggest center of Salafist followers I could find so they would know my anger and how I feel about them.

Does that sound terrible?

Even wanting that, then I sit back and stew knowing that I could kill bin Laden and Zawahiri and it would still not be over. I know that their ideology will go on and on until we either attrit it to zero in a very long war (G_d, how did people live with the threat of Nukes from the USSR for so long or with the uncertainty of WWII?) or, in a fit of sincere madness, we just go Nagasaki on the entire region.

Still, I think, however it ends, when it ends, if I am still alive, I will have that empty place. I hate them. I hate this fucking war and I love it all the same because I want it to give me what I don't think I will ever get: closure.

And now I consider deleting this message in a purely open thread because it is too raw, maybe even crazy. But, like this guy in "I miss my war", I don't think I'm alone. At least, I hope not because, if I am, I am lost.

So, it stays.


I think it came on me, not just from reading that story, though it made me think about my own view of the war (not rather it is right or wrong or whether we are winning or losing, but how I react to it on a personal level and how it has changed me), but because every day, not only do I hear about this war, it's good and bad, it's ups and down like Schindler's List, but because I feel constantly assailed by hypocritic, condescending, smarmy mouth assholes who think that the only way you can support the war is to be some chest pounding, reich-wing, warmongering, viking that purely loves to pillage and rape. Because, of course, if you do not believe as they do, if you do not denounce this war on the some simplistic idealism of a clear "conscience", you are no more complicated or intelligent than a snail.

You're supposed to pretend nothing happened. You're supposed to pretend it doesn't matter. You're supposed to pretend that tomorrow will be a better day where no Wahabi, Salafist asshole wants to kill you, yours and those around you.

I'd like to say that I don't "pretend" to anything, but that is a lie, because I wrote something more on this post and then I took it down because I belong to an organization that I support through a related website and I would not have my raw thoughts on Republicans, Democrats or the great disinterested masses that only want the world to be quiet again, to reflect upon the organization or the people that we support. So I will pretend that I am not angry and that I will quietly go about what I have been doing, supporting our men and women in uniform until they all come home, however that goes.

But, deep down, I want to scream obscenities and kick people's asses.

Today, al Qaida announced impending victory in Iraq.

Today, Nancy Pelosi learned what it was like to be hated by everyone.

Today, thousands of Iraqis and Afghans will be cared for and protected by our men and women.

Today, the Taliban related al Qaida leader, Dadullah, announced that there will be no negotiating with the United States.

Today, the Democrats supplant the Republicans at the trough and continue to swill at the expense of our men and women.

Today, the war goes on.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Democrats Trot Out the Old/New Anti-War Vets

In an effort to combat the administration and pro-war factions insistence on listening to the commanders in the field while simultaneously trying not to appear anti-war to the point of being detrimental and derogatory towards the military (after polls showed that stupid comments from Dick Durbin, Kerry, et al regarding the military were damaging their support), the Democrat party has trotted out their newest members of congress, recent veterans of the Iraq war, to put a military face on their demand for retreat. All in hopes of looking like it has a strategic purpose and support from the military and isn't just as it is: a retreat.

It was the summer of 2002, when he was still a three-star admiral commanding the USS George Washington battle group, and his aircraft carrier was sent steaming toward Iraq without the armada from other nations that had aided it during the war in Afghanistan.

``When we took a left turn into the Persian Gulf, all the Australians and British, everyone stayed behind,'' said Sestak.

Sestak, 55, is one of five freshmen House Democrats with military experience who have emerged as party leaders in the congressional debate over President George W. Bush's Iraq strategy -- appearing with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record), speaking up in caucus meetings and advising more senior colleagues.

``Other members are looking upon Tim Walz (news, bio, voting record), Joe Sestak, Chris Carney, Phil Hare (news, bio, voting record) and me to play a leadership role,'' said Representative Patrick Murphy (news, bio, voting record) of Pennsylvania, who served in Iraq as a captain in the 82nd Airborne Division.


The Democrats are learning fast on their feet. They know that they cannot get the support of the American people by aligning themselves with the "looney left" of their party, at least not in public, however much that far left wing might have brought them to power as the "base". They want to "have their cake and eat it too" by satisfying their anti-war base with the final outcome while simultaneously maintaining the appearance of having a strategic plan based on American security.

In the upcoming presidential elections, being strong on defense is still going to be a key to getting elected. Being anti-war and strong on defense is a paradox by most reasoning and it saw the defeat of the Democrats in the last presidential election. They are hoping to circumvent that by putting a "military" face on their objection to and demand to withdraw from, the Iraq front in the war on terror.

It's a new spin of the old efforts. But, this time, instead of just having some veterans throw their medals over the fence, they worked hard to put anti-war veterans into congress to give the Democrat party "face". They are also hoping to get some respect back, riding on the coat tails of the respect and trust that Americans have for their military (rated above politicians and the media).

Even the representatives are using their "connections" as a "representation" of what the "soldiers in the field" think (something they learned from the Republicans).

Of the group, Murphy, 33, is the only one to have combat experience in Iraq, where he served from 2003 to 2004 in a brigade of 3,500 troops that sustained 19 casualties. Murphy returned to Iraq last month to visit soldiers from his unit. While having lunch with the paratroopers he once commanded, he said, they encouraged him to continue his advocacy in Congress.

`One of Our Own'

A sergeant in his former unit, Juan Santiago, ``said, `Sir, keep fighting,''' Murphy recalled. ```All the guys know that one of our own made it to Washington.''


The question regarding young Santiago may be whether he made that comment in regards to "bring us home" or as simply a pat on the back for having "one of our own" make it to congress.

Of course, Murphy doesn't quote anyone else in his unit. That will be up to the Republicans to do.

The Republicans, on the other hand, are relying heavily on the success of Gen. Petraeus to make their point. Unlike the Democrats, the Republicans were too busy focusing on maintaining their seats and not busy enough supporting "pro-war" veterans for vacating Republican or Democrat seats. The Republicans continue to flounder behind the new and improved "anti-war/pro-military" Democrat party and their new/old weapon: Veterans Against the War.

This time they are smart enough to keep the radicalized, conspiracy theorists out of the main light and leave it to "respectable" anti-war vets.

If the Republican party is relying on the success of Gen. Petraeus's plan to keep the Iraq war front open, they have effectively gone to the "hail Mary" pass. Not an effective strategy at all.

Cross referenced at the Castle

Friday, February 16, 2007

New Al Qaida Tape




Hat tip Talking Proud

Cross referenced at the Castle