Showing posts with label Oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2011

Disintegrating Japan and the Future of the United States: Energy and Oil

Watching Japan disintegrate before our eyes, the ongoing disaster is nearly beyond human comprehension.  The scale of the loss of life and destruction of infrastructure has yet to be fully realized nor its true economic and strategic fallout.  


There are major predictions that this will impact the United States' economy, job creation and over all ability to borrow money.  The United States must be prepared for a long future with a diminished Japan economy in the world and strategic partner in the region. 


There are definite steps that should be taken now.  The demands of this once thriving economy will change drastically.  So will the demands of the world economy as the ability of Japanese manufacturers to meet the technological and automotive demands of their world consumers will also be seriously diminished.  There is also a likelihood of mass population displacement and migration.  

While all eyes are focused on the near future down turn, the US should be prepared to move to mitigate these circumstances and reposition our economy to fill the developing needs of both Japan and the world in general.  


First, while there is an immediate down turn in the demand for gasoline and oil, within the next few years, the demand will increase as Japan's energy consumption and supply likely changes.  With multiple reactor failures and the probability that these nuclear reactors will be inoperable, they will likely require more oil and coal to feed their rebuilding efforts and ongoing energy needs.  There is a possibility that nuclear energy will be slow to regain trust among the populace as well as the government's likely response to re-evaluating any builds based on knowledge of the engineering and structure failures as well as the ability to respond to disasters.  Further, Japan's own capacity to refine has been severely damaged.


Refinery Margins Poised to Surge After Quake If History Is Guide

“This is a super bullish factor for the Asian middle distillates and fuel-oil market,” said Akira Kamiyama, an energy derivatives trader at Mitsui & Co. in Tokyo. “Factories which have their own generating facilities will begin to buy diesel, while utilities will start purchasing fuel oil.” 

The US needs to evaluate the potential impact to US imports, supply and economics.  The rising cost of gasoline and fuel oils is severely hampering the United States' economy now.   Current attempts to change our energy supply are too slow and current administration plans represent unrealistic time frames without enough innovative or cost effective technologies.  The economic down turn has actually put projects to expand electric supply on hold.  In the meantime, the cost of the average utility bills for homes and businesses have increased by over 23%.

Food, clothing and other basic essentials have risen in direct relation to these rises. As this report indicates, there is an expected increase in diesel fuel demands.  Diesel fuel costs are directly related to the costs of these items.  Families and businesses cannot afford this increase.  The US needs to bring its oil production and refining ability up to meet near and far future demands.  The administration must review current policy on permitting drilling, existing delivery systems and capacity, and regulations governing refineries.  It may even need to review tax credits for oil industry development.

The administration needs to re-assess the time lines for development of other energy within the US.  These energy resources need to be explored and developed, but they cannot do so effectively, timely or cost effective in a down economy.  It adds to the burden over a long term instead of providing relief.  Further, it would be easier and simpler to develop these means in conjunction with developing economic regions in the US.  These regions can change depending on the changes in Japans manufacturing and development where the US may pick up this demand.

If there is any upside to this horrible event, it is that, in rebuilding, the Japanese and the United States have a unique opportunity to develop future efficient and affordable technology that will change the world as did the rebuilding of Japan after World War II.  There are current experimental technologies that are languishing without attention.  Technologies that go beyond wind farms, solar panels, LED street lights and electric cars. Innovation will come to the forefront and long ignored platforms, once thought too costly to produce, such as nanotubes or thin, flexible batteries, will become more affordable comparatively.  The potential is nearly limitless.  (nanotubes turn carbon dioxide into energy; integrated flat screen technology, strengthening structures, electric conductivity and other daily living technology from heating to heads up displays)

These advancements cannot occur when the cost to fuel plants and deliver products eats at profit margins of companies who develop this technology or want to invest in product development, hiring employees or in people being able to simply travel to work.  When gasoline prices have increased a hundred percent in a decade and, along with home energy costs, are taking a third or more of the average consumer's income, purchasing new energy efficient technology may be necessary, but it becomes equally and increasingly out of reach.  Those purchases provide the capital for research and development.

It is the circle of economic life and that life is currently slipping from serious condition to critical.  Therefore, it is necessary for the United States to re-evaluate it's energy plan.  Increased oil and gasoline production and refinement must be part of a rational and immediate energy integration plan.  This is not an "either/or" situation.  It must be together, or the United States cannot move forward.


On another note:  Japan is liquefying US treasury bonds and China is likely the next biggest buyer.  At the same time, China is now reported as surpassing the US in manufacturing:

China has passed the U.S. as the biggest manufacturer in the world, having 19.8% of world output in 2010. The U.S. lagged behind at 19.4%.
 









Tuesday, March 08, 2011

Libya, Obama, Islamists and War for Oil

It is difficult not to agree with Barnett's analysis on US intervention in Libya. To wit, that interfering in Libya may make the "Arabs" angry over continued conspiracy of American Imperialism, but, to do nothing will have the same results and worse, like in the days of Rwanda, we might find it difficult to face ourselves in the morning.

We let this go down and we'll be hated anyway, and we hate ourselves for letting it happen. So what is the big difference? There will be no working with the guy after this anyway, so what is the downside? The Saudis hate him, because of the hit he tried on Abdullah.

There is the problem of do we actually know who is who and who we would be helping?

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Gasoline Prices: Prepare for a Pain in the Wallet

Between the Iran Crisis and the impending nationalization (take over) of oil fields in Venezuela, world consumers should prepare for a deep pain the wallet.

Once recognized as a world leader among state-owned companies, PDVSA today is a troubled entity struggling to cope with responsibilities that far exceed merely pumping oil. Ch?vez taps the state-owned giant to finance an array of social programs at home and to cement his regional influence through subsidized oil exports to allies such as Cuba and Bolivia.[snip]

If an overtaxed PDVSA stumbles, the United States could feel the reverberations. In January, Venezuela, a leading member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), was the USA's fifth-largest source of imported oil, shipping 955,000 barrels of crude each day. That figure is 23% below the level of one year ago, reflecting the aging of Venezuela's oil fields and its compliance with OPEC production quotas.[anip]

Today, employment exceeds pre-strike levels, and Venezuela claims to be producing 3.3 million barrels of oil per day. But the International Energy Agency in Paris puts current production at 2.43 million barrels, and analysts say PDVSA continues to suffer the lingering effects of the political battles that consumed it in recent years.[snip]

Just to maintain current production, PDVSA must invest $3 billion annually in its aging fields, EIA says. But Ch?vez has drained PDVSA's coffers to fund generous health, education, literacy and food programs, leaving insufficient funds for its core operations.

The oil company's obligations to the poor appear to be mushrooming. PDVSA last week disclosed that it spent $13.3 billion last year on social programs, almost twice as much as in 2005 and more than it invests in its oil operations.

Incredibly, at a time of sky-high oil prices, the company's net income last year fell 26% to $4.8 billion on $101 billion in revenue, according to unaudited financial results published in Caracas. That's less profitable than other state-owned oil producers such as Norway's Statoil, which last year was twice as profitable as PDVSA in terms of net income as a percentage of revenue.[snip]


In addition, Venezuela is over stating it's current production. Venezuela says it is producing 3.3 million/bbl when the EIA puts it at 2.43 million (and falling if needed investment in the infrastructure is not made). Second, PDVSA is claiming that it will boost oil production to 5.8 mil/bbls per day by the end of 2008. Most experts say these projections "lack credibility". Third, Venezuela is claiming that it's exploration will boost it's "reserves" to 316 bil/bbls, replacing Saudi Arabia as number 1 in the world.

The real tell is here:

The new Orinoco contract terms, however, will raise the break-even price of the four projects from about $18 per barrel to $35, Sira says. And that change, coupled with the political risk associated with operating amid an uncharted socialist revolution, means the private oil companies are unlikely to make the additional investments Venezuela needs.


With the rise in price and the lack of investment that will most likely result in a decline in production, world oil prices will continue to rise and world consumers will feel a deep pain in their wallet. Particularly, consumers in the United States.

Publius Pundit notes that other Latin American nations are boosting their sales to the US: Brazil and Colombia. Publius says look for a possible re-alignment of security. This shift has been coming for awhile since the introduction of CAFTA that President Bush signed into law in 2005. Hugo Chavez has opposed CAFTA for several reasons. He opposes US "interference" in Central America. He may believe that Central America should become its own "sphere of influence" and support each other. He's made several attempts to bring other nations into his "sphere" including Bolivia and Argentine. He may also believe that trade agreements with other Central American countries, especially those with energy resources, will undercut Venezuela's trading power.

The key to continuing economic success in the US is a stable energy resource. Stable energy resources come from diversified investment and imports. The question is whether this diversification and improved production in these nations can offset the problems Venezuela, Iran and the continuing ME crisis are causing.

Your pain may vary.

***Heh. Even the Ayatollah of Iran knows that it's Economic Warfare among other things:

Ayatollah Khamenei called “psychological warfare, economic war, and countering the scientific development of Iranian people” the three main approaches of the enemies.[snip]

Pointing to the enemies’ “economic war” against the country, he said they want to put the people in a difficult economic situation but with the announcement of the Article 44 of the Constitution and a serious effort by government to implement the privatization plan a new opportunity has been opened for economic recovery in the country.

Pointing to economic threats against Iran for its nuclear program, he said, “the Iranian nation has developed and gained access to nuclear energy through such sanctions and therefore don’t scare this nation of sanctions.”


You think?

Everybody thinks.

(h/t Pajamas Media)

Apparently, the United States will attack Iran at 4 AM on April 6 (Good Friday). I don't believe it, but it is some interesting propaganda.